From 1afb6e6e3b23bd5555f34cc4dcd20349dfd789de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stanislav Tkach Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:08:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Extend example for the `unneeded_field_pattern` lint Current example is incorrect (or pseudo-code) because a struct name is omitted. I have used the code from the tests instead. Perhaps this example can be made less verbose, but I think it is more convenient to see a "real" code as an example. --- clippy_lints/src/misc_early.rs | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/misc_early.rs b/clippy_lints/src/misc_early.rs index adfd8dfb1c18..62ee051624b4 100644 --- a/clippy_lints/src/misc_early.rs +++ b/clippy_lints/src/misc_early.rs @@ -24,8 +24,25 @@ declare_clippy_lint! { /// **Known problems:** None. /// /// **Example:** - /// ```ignore - /// let { a: _, b: ref b, c: _ } = .. + /// ```rust + /// # struct Foo { + /// # a: i32, + /// # b: i32, + /// # c: i32, + /// # } + /// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 }; + /// + /// // Bad + /// match f { + /// Foo { a: _, b: 0, .. } => {}, + /// Foo { a: _, b: _, c: _ } => {}, + /// } + /// + /// // Good + /// match f { + /// Foo { b: 0, .. } => {}, + /// Foo { .. } => {}, + /// } /// ``` pub UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN, restriction,