Should have a stack-probe test that doesn't need std's overflow handler #125390
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
C-enhancement
Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Many platforms need to ignore
stack-probes.rs
simply because they cannot emit the right lines of text. I think testing std's stack overflow handler and its messaging should be distinguished from the possibly more critical question of "well, do we have stack probes or not?"See:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: