Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished #121530

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wgslr
Copy link
Contributor

@wgslr wgslr commented Feb 23, 2024

Fixes the explanation how to use is_finished to achieve a non-blocking join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped JoinHandle::is_finished.

Fixes the explanation how to use is_finished to achieve a non-blocking
join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped
JoinHandle::is_finished.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 23, 2024
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 24, 2024

📌 Commit 7234c98 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 24, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished

Fixes the explanation how to use `is_finished` to achieve a non-blocking join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped JoinHandle::is_finished.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121343 (Add examples for some methods on slices)
 - rust-lang#121374 (match lowering: Split off `test_candidates` into several functions and improve comments)
 - rust-lang#121474 (Ignore compiletest test directive migration commits)
 - rust-lang#121515 (promotion: don't promote int::MIN / -1)
 - rust-lang#121530 (Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished)
 - rust-lang#121551 (Forbid use of `extern "C-unwind"` inside standard library)
 - rust-lang#121556 (Use `addr_of!`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 106e30e into rust-lang:master Feb 25, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 25, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121530 - wgslr:master, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished

Fixes the explanation how to use `is_finished` to achieve a non-blocking join. The updated version matches the documentation of the non-scoped JoinHandle::is_finished.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants