diff --git a/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_parser.rs b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_parser.rs
index dd82add08dd98..a419612e315df 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_parser.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_parser.rs
@@ -345,6 +345,38 @@ fn initial_matcher_pos<'root, 'tt>(ms: &'tt [TokenTree]) -> MatcherPos<'root, 't
 /// token tree. The depth of the `NamedMatch` structure will therefore depend
 /// only on the nesting depth of `ast::TTSeq`s in the originating
 /// token tree it was derived from.
+///
+/// In layman's terms: `NamedMatch` will form a tree representing nested matches of a particular
+/// meta variable. For example, if we are matching the following macro against the following
+/// invocation...
+///
+/// ```rust
+/// macro_rules! foo {
+///   ($($($x:ident),+);+) => {}
+/// }
+///
+/// foo!(a, b, c, d; a, b, c, d, e);
+/// ```
+///
+/// Then, the tree will have the following shape:
+///
+/// ```rust
+/// MatchedSeq([
+///   MatchedSeq([
+///     MatchedNonterminal(a),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(b),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(c),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(d),
+///   ]),
+///   MatchedSeq([
+///     MatchedNonterminal(a),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(b),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(c),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(d),
+///     MatchedNonterminal(e),
+///   ])
+/// ])
+/// ```
 #[derive(Debug, Clone)]
 crate enum NamedMatch {
     MatchedSeq(Lrc<NamedMatchVec>),
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/transcribe.rs b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/transcribe.rs
index 01a7f7266172c..54000527c15b9 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/transcribe.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/transcribe.rs
@@ -358,6 +358,12 @@ impl LockstepIterSize {
 /// Note that if `repeats` does not match the exact correct depth of a meta-var,
 /// `lookup_cur_matched` will return `None`, which is why this still works even in the presence of
 /// multiple nested matcher sequences.
+///
+/// Example: `$($($x $y)+*);+` -- we need to make sure that `x` and `y` repeat the same amount as
+/// each other at the given depth when the macro was invoked. If they don't it might mean they were
+/// declared at unequal depths or there was a compile bug. For example, if we have 3 repetitions of
+/// the outer sequence and 4 repetitions of the inner sequence for `x`, we should have the same for
+/// `y`; otherwise, we can't transcribe them both at the given depth.
 fn lockstep_iter_size(
     tree: &mbe::TokenTree,
     interpolations: &FxHashMap<MacroRulesNormalizedIdent, NamedMatch>,