Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve error handling in check #222

Open
simonsan opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #224
Open

Improve error handling in check #222

simonsan opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #224
Labels
S-triage Status: Waiting for a maintainer to triage this issue/PR

Comments

@simonsan
Copy link
Contributor

simonsan commented May 5, 2024

First, the most important thing is that prune (being the only command which removes pack or index files) doesn't leave the repository in an unsane condition. This is why check is called here. (to admit, check currently does not produce an error but only logs an error! - I'm about to improve this next).

Originally posted by @aawsome in #221 (comment)
@github-actions github-actions bot added the S-triage Status: Waiting for a maintainer to triage this issue/PR label May 5, 2024
@aawsome aawsome linked a pull request May 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
S-triage Status: Waiting for a maintainer to triage this issue/PR
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix(commands): return error if check fails rustic-rs/rustic_core
1 participant
@simonsan