We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See: rust-lang/rust#63791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similarly, should there be an advisory for:
Rust 1.45.0: Regression from 1.44 to 1.45 rust-lang/rust#74739
Rust 1.41.0: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/02/27/Rust-1.41.1.html
In theory, these could cause security vulnerabilities?
Sorry, something went wrong.
For some reason aes-soft never got never got an advisory - or it's not there atm RustCrypto/block-ciphers#51 (comment)
I started a wider discussion whether we should file advisories against Rustc - which we don't atm #1353
We need to see if it is feasible to file advisories against Rustc first - Closing until that is resolved.
No branches or pull requests
See: rust-lang/rust#63791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: