fix(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-import-x to ^0.5.0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
eslint-plugin-import-x	^0.4.4 -> ^0.5.0

---

Release Notes

un-ts/eslint-plugin-import-x (eslint-plugin-import-x)

v0.5.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​66 49418a0 Thanks @​JounQin! - chore(dep)!: drop eslint <8.56 support

• #​66 49418a0 Thanks @​JounQin! - feat!: upgrade @​typescript-eslint/utils to v7

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone Asia/Shanghai, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 708 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +39 -669
Percentile : 90.27%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +1 -1
.yaml : +38 -668

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/dotenv-expand@11.0.6	None	0	18.2 kB	motdotla
npm/dotenv@16.4.5	environment, filesystem	0	79.1 kB	motdotla
npm/envinfo@7.11.1	environment, eval, filesystem, shell	0	162 kB	tabrindle

View full report↗︎