Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make a few held functions able to evaluate #10071

Open
kcrisman opened this issue Oct 5, 2010 · 1 comment
Open

make a few held functions able to evaluate #10071

kcrisman opened this issue Oct 5, 2010 · 1 comment

Comments

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

kcrisman commented Oct 5, 2010

After #9901 is merged, there are a few held functions which can't evaluate through Maxima or n(), I think. Since this behavior didn't exist at all before, this is ok, but should be rectified. These would be the methods csgn, step, and Order of symbolic expressions. See also #10070 for step.

Component: symbolics

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10071

@kcrisman kcrisman added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Oct 5, 2010
@kcrisman
Copy link
Member Author

kcrisman commented Oct 6, 2010

comment:1

This is related to #10034, which is about making it possible for all held functions to be evaluated without using Maxima or n(). This ticket, however, is about three held functions which can't even be evaluated with Maxima and n(), much less Pynac natively.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants