-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update PolyBoRi to upstream release 0.7-1 #11261
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:2
The package can be reviewed (independently of reverting #11019). |
comment:3
I added a small patch, that makes PolyBoRi compatible with upcoming M4RI release: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/spkg/polybori-0.7.1.p1.spkg It also fixed the issue that the while site-packages directory was recompiled. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:4
Probably not the proper place to report this but I have tried to compile polybori against m4ri-20100817 and it doesn't work:
Are you meaning a later release of m4ri that will fix this? |
comment:5
It seems that the header |
comment:6
@kiwifb Switching to the development version at bibucket should also fix that issue. |
comment:7
I didn't know about the polybori page on bitbucket, thanks for pointing it out. Actually if you make the release available on bitbucket it would be easier to automatically fetch than sourceforge. Thanks for the patch. |
comment:8
I meant the bitbucket repo of m4ri, but of course you may also have a look at PolyBoRi there. The "Downloads" section of bitbucket is automatically generated from mercurial tags. I just realized that the releases 0.7.0 and 0.7.1 are missing albeit the tags do exist. Maybe I'll have to contact the support there. |
comment:9
Just to be picky the patch hasn't been made with the git compatibility mode which means that "plain patch" doesn't like it. It shouldn't get in the way of merging this ticket I am just mentioning. |
Backporting m4ri header issue patch from upcoming PolyBoRi 0.8 |
comment:10
Attachment: polybori-m4ri20100817.patch.gz I hope this patch applies better. |
comment:11
Thx. |
comment:12
This should be rebased on the spkg from #11331 when the latter is accepted. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:14
After Sage 4.7 being out (a while, I must admit), I rebased it the spkg to the most recent one from Sage. Please have a look at it: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/spkg/polybori-0.7.1.p2.spkg |
comment:15
BTW all tests pass on a SLES 11 Linux (64 bits). |
comment:16
I should do some test on vanilla sage but I shamelessly decided to skip 0.7 altogether in favor of that one for sage-on-gentoo for sage-4.7 and over. Works a treat on x86 and amd64. Still an annoying problem on macos that is not mirrored in the vanilla version for some reason. |
comment:17
I have often several times that installing one package breaks some completely unrelated tests, while replacing the spkg and building all Sage from scratch works fine. Does |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:19
Attachment: plot.py.patch.gz I backported another thing from 0.8: polybori.plot may use jinja2, where available http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/spkg/polybori-0.7.1.p3.spkg See the attached patch for details. |
comment:20
Passes relevant tests on PPC OS X 10.4. |
comment:21
To push this forward: it builds/installs on Solaris (t2) and passes all tests in sage/rings/polynomial/. (I tested it with the official Sage 4.7 build for Solaris.) |
comment:22
I've also used this version for a while and it seems to work fine. Given the reports of extensive tests above, I am switching this to positive review. |
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal |
Changed reviewer from Burcin Erocal to Burcin Erocal, Francois Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:26
The spkg contains files which are not world-readable. In order to avoid another #11660, this should be fixed by a simple
|
comment:27
See also #11664 to do the same in sage-4.7.1 with polybori-0.7. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:28
I rebased the package on #11664 and did the chmod here: |
comment:29
Files are world-readable now. returning to positive review. |
Merged: sage-4.7.2.alpha1 |
Changed reviewer from Burcin Erocal, Francois Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman to Burcin Erocal, François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman |
There was a small bugfix release of PolyBoRi.
Perhaps we can revert #11019.
Current spkg:
Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning.
CC: Martin Albrecht @sagetrac-PolyBoRi @burcin
Component: packages: standard
Author: Alexander Dreyer
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal, François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman
Merged: sage-4.7.2.alpha1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11261
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: