Update MPFI to 1.5.1 #12171

mwhansen · 2011-12-17T10:49:25Z

This is needed for #11666.

Use http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/~flori/sage/mpfi-1.5.1.spkg

Apply first attachment: trac_12171a.patch, then attachment: trac_12171b.patch

Depends on #12131
Depends on #12353

CC: @sagetrac-cwitty @robertwb @jdemeyer @jpflori

Component: packages: standard

Keywords: sd35 sd36

Author: Mike Hansen, Paul Zimmermann, Jean-Pierre Flori

Reviewer: François Bissey

Merged: sage-5.0.beta6

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12171

mwhansen · 2011-12-17T10:53:26Z

comment:2

There is spkg at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/mpfi-1.5.0.spkg

kiwifb · 2011-12-17T18:44:17Z

comment:3

Have you checked the following doctests:

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py"              
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 3808:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RR)
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 3810:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDD'))
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 3812:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDU'))
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 3814:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDZ'))
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   4 of  20 in __main__.example_96
***Test Failed*** 4 failures.

and

sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx"         
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1078:
    sage: b = R(1)/R(0); b
Expected:
    [+infinity .. +infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1080:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1082:
    sage: b = R(-1)/R(0); b
Expected:
    [-infinity .. -infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1084:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 2360:
    sage: R(1)/R(0)
Expected:
    [+infinity .. +infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 3217:
    sage: RIF(-1, 1).min(0).endpoints()
Expected:
    (-1.00000000000000, 0.000000000000000)
Got:
    (-1.00000000000000, -0.000000000000000)
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 3221:
    sage: RIF(-1, 1).min(0).endpoints()
Expected:
    (-1.00000000000000, 0.000000000000000)
Got:
    (-1.00000000000000, -0.000000000000000)
**********************************************************************
3 items had failures:
   4 of  18 in __main__.example_29
   1 of   8 in __main__.example_55
   2 of   9 in __main__.example_80
***Test Failed*** 7 failures.

I did those test about one year ago cschwan/sage-on-gentoo#30 so some things have probably changed a little bit but I expect you'll have to patch sage.

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-19T12:52:42Z

comment:4

by the way, MPFI 1.5.0 fixes a limitation to 1000 characters in mpfi_set_str, which can be
demonstrated by the following test:

sage: R = RealIntervalField(53)
sage: R("1" * 1000)
1.111111111111112?e999

which failed previously. Maybe add a test for that?

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-19T13:35:41Z

comment:5

two doctests are failing:

        sage -t  devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/qqbar.py # 4 doctests failed
        sage -t  devel/sage-11666/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx # 7 doctests failed

The issues are +0.0 versus -0.0, and also 1/0 which now gives [-Inf, +Inf]
instead of [+Inf, +Inf].

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-19T17:59:35Z

comment:6

there is one important change in MPFI 1.5.0 which might cause the failures: mpfi_set_ui on
input 0 gives [+0.0,-0.0] instead of [+0.0,+0.0] previously. I will ask upstream why:

sage: R=RealIntervalField(53)
sage: a=R(0)
sage: a.lower(), a.upper()
(0.000000000000000, -0.000000000000000)

More annoying is the following, which I believe is a bug in MPFI 1.5.0:

sage: a=R(infinity)
sage: a.lower(), a.upper()
(+infinity, +infinity)
sage: b=1/a
sage: b.lower(), b.upper()
(0.000000000000000, -0.000000000000000)

(I would expect b=[+0.0,+0.0].)

Paul

mwhansen · 2011-12-20T12:48:04Z

Changed keywords from none to sd35

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-21T11:20:22Z

comment:8

the detailed failures (on a 32-bit computer) are:


macaron% ./sage -t devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx 
sage -t  "devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx"        
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 4142:
    sage: 0 in (RealField(2000)(-19/3).gamma() - RealIntervalField(1000)(-19/3).gamma())
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1082:
    sage: b = R(1)/R(0); b
Expected:
    [+infinity .. +infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1084:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1086:
    sage: b = R(-1)/R(0); b
Expected:
    [-infinity .. -infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]

**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1088:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 2364:
    sage: R(1)/R(0)
Expected:
    [+infinity .. +infinity]
Got:
    [-infinity .. +infinity]
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 3221:
    sage: RIF(-1, 1).min(0).endpoints()
Expected:
    (-1.00000000000000, 0.000000000000000)
Got:
    (-1.00000000000000, -0.000000000000000)
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 3225:
    sage: RIF(-1, 1).min(0).endpoints()
Expected:
    (-1.00000000000000, 0.000000000000000)
Got:
    (-1.00000000000000, -0.000000000000000)

**********************************************************************
4 items had failures:
   1 of  19 in __main__.example_117
   4 of  19 in __main__.example_29
   1 of   9 in __main__.example_55
   2 of  10 in __main__.example_80
***Test Failed*** 8 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file /users/caramel/zimmerma/.sage//tmp/real_mpfi_8949.py
         [8.1 s]

and:


macaron% ./sage -t devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py 
sage -t  "devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py"             
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4003:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RR)
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4005:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDD'))
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4007:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDU'))
Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
File "/localdisk/tmp/sage-4.7.2/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 4009:
    sage: (x-2).real_exact(RealField(53, rnd='RNDZ'))

Expected:
    0.000000000000000
Got:
    -0.000000000000000
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   4 of  21 in __main__.example_101
***Test Failed*** 4 failures.

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-21T11:21:31Z

comment:9

the first issue with gamma seems to be due to that bug in Sage:

sage: RealIntervalField(54)(-19/3) > 1.462
True

(works for precision 53 or less).

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-21T11:27:03Z

comment:10

I got a message from the developers of the Sollya package who say that they had similar
problems when upgrading to MPFI 1.5.0. Their solution was to write a wrapper around
MPFI to give sense to intervals like [+Inf,+Inf].

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-22T09:44:49Z

comment:11

the problem from comment [comment:9] seems to only apply on 32-bit machines. I'll first try to
solve problems on 64-bit. There is one strange thing with the patch applied:

sage: x = AA(2).sqrt()^2
sage: (x-2).real_exact(RR)
0.000000000000000
sage: x.real_exact(RR)
2.00000000000000
sage: (x-2).real_exact(RR)
-0.000000000000000

The MPFI developers claim that in MPFI 1.5 the sign of 0 is irrelevant, but this is still a
non-deterministic issue.

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-22T09:49:12Z

Attachment: trac_12171a.patch.gz

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-22T09:54:52Z

comment:12

the attached trac_12171a.patch fixes all issues but two on 64-bit. The remaining issues
are related to loads(dumps(b)) == b:

File "/usr/local/sage-4.7.2/sage/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1084:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False
**********************************************************************
File "/usr/local/sage-4.7.2/sage/devel/sage-12171/sage/rings/real_mpfi.pyx", line 1088:
    sage: loads(dumps(b)) == b
Expected:
    True
Got:
    False

I see in real_mpfi.pyx that other similar tests are failing and were rewritten in a
different way:

sage: R = RealIntervalField(4000)
sage: s = 1/R(3)
sage: t = loads(dumps(s))
sage: (t.upper(), t.lower()) == (s.upper(), s.lower())
True

Indeed t==s fails:

sage: t == s
False

Should I also rewrite the 2 failing tests like this? What is the reason for the failures?

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-23T18:37:56Z

comment:13

Should I also rewrite the 2 failing tests like this? What is the reason for the failures?

Robert, Mike, are you there?

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-27T09:05:26Z

comment:14

Jeroen, since I got no answer to my question I ask you: do you have an idea how to proceed?

Paul

mwhansen · 2011-12-27T17:24:41Z

comment:15

Hi Paul, sorry for the delay; I've been busy with traveling back to the states / the holidays. I'll look into why these are failing today. I started while I was in Warwick, but didn't make much progress.

kiwifb · 2011-12-31T03:34:54Z

comment:17

Replying to @zimmermann6:

I see in real_mpfi.pyx that other similar tests are failing and were rewritten in a
different way:
sage: R = RealIntervalField(4000)
sage: s = 1/R(3)
sage: t = loads(dumps(s))
sage: (t.upper(), t.lower()) == (s.upper(), s.lower())
True
Indeed t==s fails:
sage: t == s
False
Should I also rewrite the 2 failing tests like this? What is the reason for the failures?

This is quite strange I cannot think of a reason this would fail unless the "==" operator is doing something slightly wrong or something unexpected.

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-31T10:04:38Z

comment:18

ok I understand why the following "fails":

sage: R = RealIntervalField(100)
sage: s = 1/R(3)
sage: t = loads(dumps(s))
sage: t == s
False

In the real_mpfi.pyx file, it is said that s cmp t returns True if a cmp b is true for any
element a in s and any element b in t. Obviously when cmp is == and t is the same interval as s
this can hold only when both are the same point interval. Thus to check if s and t are the same
interval, we should write:

sage: (t.upper(), t.lower()) == (s.upper(), s.lower())
True

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-31T10:13:39Z

this patch should be applied after trac_12171a.patch

zimmermann6 · 2011-12-31T10:15:36Z

comment:19

Attachment: trac_12171b.patch.gz

the second patch attached fixes the remaining failing tests. Ready for review.

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2012-01-26T06:57:36Z

comment:63

Francois,

I just built Sage 5.0.beta1 on another 64 bit linux (Core2 under Ubuntu 10.10) and got:

tarte% ./sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Sage Version 5.0.beta1, Release Date: 2012-01-22                   |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
*                                                                    *
* Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable.     *
*                                                                    *
**********************************************************************
sage: RealIntervalField(53)(-1) > RR(1)
False
sage: RealIntervalField(54)(-1) > RR(1)
True

Paul

kiwifb · 2012-01-28T00:28:21Z

comment:64

This is way more subtle than I thought then. I did my tests without #11666, did you use #11666 as well as this one?

zimmermann6 · 2012-01-28T06:56:10Z

comment:65

Francois,

no, I didn't use #11666. Can anybody reproduce the problem I have (cf #12353)?
Anyway I believe this is independent from this ticket, since it already happened before
(e.g., in Sage 4.7.2). Thus it should not prevent a positive review, if this is the only
remaining issue, and we should solve #12353 independently.

Paul

jdemeyer · 2012-01-29T11:10:26Z

comment:66

Everything I said was without #11666.

kiwifb · 2012-01-30T02:41:59Z

comment:67

Replying to @zimmermann6:

Francois,

no, I didn't use #11666. Can anybody reproduce the problem I have (cf #12353)?
Anyway I believe this is independent from this ticket, since it already happened before
(e.g., in Sage 4.7.2). Thus it should not prevent a positive review, if this is the only
remaining issue, and we should solve #12353 independently.

I can reproduce it on OS X 10.5.8 (32bit) and linux on ppc64, but not on linux x86_64. You are probably right that's an orthogonal problem if it can happen as well in the current version of sage.

zimmermann6 · 2012-01-30T08:06:01Z

comment:68

since this ticket got a positive review at comment [comment:49], and the doctest
failure at comment [comment:50] is a separate issue (#12353) I put this back as "needs review".

Paul

jdemeyer · 2012-01-30T10:16:05Z

comment:69

If nothing on this ticket changed, I guess we're back to positive review with a dependency on #12353.

jdemeyer · 2012-01-30T10:16:05Z

Changed dependencies from #12131 to #12131, #12353

zimmermann6 · 2012-01-30T10:26:58Z

comment:70

Replying to @jdemeyer:

If nothing on this ticket changed, I guess we're back to positive review with a dependency on #12353.

great! I'm working in #12353.

Paul

zimmermann6 · 2012-02-16T11:22:34Z

comment:71

Jeroen, now that #12353 has been fixed, you can merge this one too.

Paul

jdemeyer · 2012-02-16T21:24:30Z

comment:72

Replying to @zimmermann6:

Jeroen, now that #12353 has been fixed, you can merge this one too.

Don't worry, it's on my radar and should be merged in sage-5.0.beta5 if no further problems arise.

jdemeyer · 2012-02-20T19:37:56Z

comment:73

In spkg-install, you should unset RM as old Sage versions set RM=rm which breaks libtool. For example, when upgrading from sage-4.5.3:

/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -O2 -g -fPIC  -L/mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib -L/mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib  -o libmpfi.la -rpath /mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib abs.lo acos.lo acosh.lo add.lo add_d.lo add_fr.lo add_q.lo add_si.lo add_ui.lo add_z.lo alea.lo asin.lo asinh.lo atan2.lo atan.lo atanh.lo bisect.lo blow.lo cbrt.lo clear.lo cmp.lo cmp_sym_pi.lo constants.lo cos.lo cosh.lo csc.lo csch.lo cot.lo coth.lo d_div.lo d_sub.lo diam.lo div.lo div_2exp.lo div_2si.lo div_2ui.lo div_d.lo div_fr.lo div_q.lo div_si.lo div_ui.lo div_z.lo error.lo exp.lo exp2.lo expm1.lo fr_div.lo fr_sub.lo get_endpoints.lo get_fr.lo get_d.lo get_prec.lo get_version.lo has_zero.lo hypot.lo increase.lo init.lo intersect.lo interv_d.lo interv_fr.lo interv_q.lo interv_si.lo interv_ui.lo interv_z.lo inp_str.lo inv.lo is_empty.lo is_inside.lo log.lo log10.lo log1p.lo log2.lo mag.lo mid.lo mig.lo mul.lo mul_2exp.lo mul_2si.lo mul_2ui.lo mul_d.lo mul_fr.lo mul_q.lo mul_si.lo mul_ui.lo mul_z.lo neg.lo out_str.lo predicates.lo print_binary.lo put.lo put_d.lo put_fr.lo put_q.lo put_si.lo put_ui.lo put_z.lo q_div.lo q_sub.lo quadrant.lo revert_if_needed.lo round_prec.lo sec.lo sech.lo set.lo set_d.lo set_fr.lo set_prec.lo set_q.lo set_si.lo set_str.lo set_ui.lo set_z.lo si_div.lo si_sub.lo sign.lo sin.lo sinh.lo sqr.lo sqrt.lo sub.lo sub_d.lo sub_fr.lo sub_q.lo sub_si.lo sub_ui.lo sub_z.lo swap.lo tan.lo tanh.lo ui_div.lo ui_sub.lo union.lo urandom.lo z_div.lo z_sub.lo  -lmpfr -lgmp
libtool: link: gcc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC  .libs/abs.o .libs/acos.o .libs/acosh.o .libs/add.o .libs/add_d.o .libs/add_fr.o .libs/add_q.o .libs/add_si.o .libs/add_ui.o .libs/add_z.o .libs/alea.o .libs/asin.o .libs/asinh.o .libs/atan2.o .libs/atan.o .libs/atanh.o .libs/bisect.o .libs/blow.o .libs/cbrt.o .libs/clear.o .libs/cmp.o .libs/cmp_sym_pi.o .libs/constants.o .libs/cos.o .libs/cosh.o .libs/csc.o .libs/csch.o .libs/cot.o .libs/coth.o .libs/d_div.o .libs/d_sub.o .libs/diam.o .libs/div.o .libs/div_2exp.o .libs/div_2si.o .libs/div_2ui.o .libs/div_d.o .libs/div_fr.o .libs/div_q.o .libs/div_si.o .libs/div_ui.o .libs/div_z.o .libs/error.o .libs/exp.o .libs/exp2.o .libs/expm1.o .libs/fr_div.o .libs/fr_sub.o .libs/get_endpoints.o .libs/get_fr.o .libs/get_d.o .libs/get_prec.o .libs/get_version.o .libs/has_zero.o .libs/hypot.o .libs/increase.o .libs/init.o .libs/intersect.o .libs/interv_d.o .libs/interv_fr.o .libs/interv_q.o .libs/interv_si.o .libs/interv_ui.o .libs/interv_z.o .libs/inp_str.o .libs/inv.o .libs/is_empty.o .libs/is_inside.o .libs/log.o .libs/log10.o .libs/log1p.o .libs/log2.o .libs/mag.o .libs/mid.o .libs/mig.o .libs/mul.o .libs/mul_2exp.o .libs/mul_2si.o .libs/mul_2ui.o .libs/mul_d.o .libs/mul_fr.o .libs/mul_q.o .libs/mul_si.o .libs/mul_ui.o .libs/mul_z.o .libs/neg.o .libs/out_str.o .libs/predicates.o .libs/print_binary.o .libs/put.o .libs/put_d.o .libs/put_fr.o .libs/put_q.o .libs/put_si.o .libs/put_ui.o .libs/put_z.o .libs/q_div.o .libs/q_sub.o .libs/quadrant.o .libs/revert_if_needed.o .libs/round_prec.o .libs/sec.o .libs/sech.o .libs/set.o .libs/set_d.o .libs/set_fr.o .libs/set_prec.o .libs/set_q.o .libs/set_si.o .libs/set_str.o .libs/set_ui.o .libs/set_z.o .libs/si_div.o .libs/si_sub.o .libs/sign.o .libs/sin.o .libs/sinh.o .libs/sqr.o .libs/sqrt.o .libs/sub.o .libs/sub_d.o .libs/sub_fr.o .libs/sub_q.o .libs/sub_si.o .libs/sub_ui.o .libs/sub_z.o .libs/swap.o .libs/tan.o .libs/tanh.o .libs/ui_div.o .libs/ui_sub.o .libs/union.o .libs/urandom.o .libs/z_div.o .libs/z_sub.o   -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib -L/mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib /mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib/libmpfr.so /mnt/usb1/scratch/buildbot/sage/sage-1/sage_upgrade/build/sage-4.5.3-5.0.beta5/local/lib/libgmp.so  -O2   -Wl,-soname -Wl,libmpfi.so.0 -o .libs/libmpfi.so.0.0.0
libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm "libmpfi.so.0" && ln -s "libmpfi.so.0.0.0" "libmpfi.so.0")
rm: cannot remove `libmpfi.so.0': No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [libmpfi.la] Error 1

jpflori · 2012-02-22T10:26:11Z

comment:74

An updated package is available at the same address.

I also added a mecurial tag for mpfi-1.5.1.

vbraun · 2012-02-22T19:53:20Z

Changed keywords from sd35 to sd35 sd36

vbraun · 2012-02-22T19:53:20Z

comment:75

Looks good!

jdemeyer · 2012-02-27T11:21:32Z

Merged: sage-5.0.beta6

mwhansen added this to the sage-4.8 milestone Dec 17, 2011

mwhansen added c: packages: standard labels Dec 17, 2011

mwhansen changed the title ~~Update MPIR to 1.5.0~~ Update MPFI to 1.5.0 Dec 17, 2011

mwhansen added the s: needs review label Dec 17, 2011

zimmermann6 added s: needs work and removed s: needs review labels Dec 19, 2011

zimmermann6 added s: needs info and removed s: needs work labels Dec 22, 2011

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

zimmermann6 added s: needs review and removed s: needs work labels Jan 30, 2012

jdemeyer added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Jan 30, 2012

jdemeyer added s: needs work and removed s: positive review labels Feb 20, 2012

jpflori added s: needs review and removed s: needs work labels Feb 22, 2012

vbraun added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Feb 22, 2012

jdemeyer removed the s: positive review label Feb 27, 2012

jdemeyer closed this as completed Feb 27, 2012

nexttime mannequin mentioned this issue Mar 4, 2012

Upgrade MPFR to 3.1.0 #11666

Closed

jdemeyer mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2012

Fix packages wanting to run autoconf #12501

Closed

Update MPFI to 1.5.1 #12171

Update MPFI to 1.5.1 #12171

Comments

mwhansen commented Dec 17, 2011

mwhansen commented Dec 17, 2011

kiwifb commented Dec 17, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 19, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 19, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 19, 2011

mwhansen commented Dec 20, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 21, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 21, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 21, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 22, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 22, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 22, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 23, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 27, 2011

mwhansen commented Dec 27, 2011

kiwifb commented Dec 31, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 31, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 31, 2011

zimmermann6 commented Dec 31, 2011

This comment has been minimized.

zimmermann6 commented Jan 26, 2012

kiwifb commented Jan 28, 2012

zimmermann6 commented Jan 28, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jan 29, 2012

kiwifb commented Jan 30, 2012

zimmermann6 commented Jan 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jan 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jan 30, 2012

zimmermann6 commented Jan 30, 2012

zimmermann6 commented Feb 16, 2012

jdemeyer commented Feb 16, 2012

jdemeyer commented Feb 20, 2012

jpflori commented Feb 22, 2012

vbraun commented Feb 22, 2012

vbraun commented Feb 22, 2012

jdemeyer commented Feb 27, 2012