Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge and improve sage's benchmarking frameworks #16510

Closed
mezzarobba opened this issue Jun 21, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Merge and improve sage's benchmarking frameworks #16510

mezzarobba opened this issue Jun 21, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@mezzarobba
Copy link
Member

Some experimental work I started a while ago and have no time to continue right now.

Overall goal: make it easy both to benchmark sage against other tools and to track the performance of various subsystems across versions.

More or less done:

  • Merge the various existing bits of benchmarking infrastructure.
  • Port existing benchmarks to the unified framework.
    Todo:
  • Support creating benchmark suites.
  • Support saving the results of a run (to compare several versions of sage or test the performance impact of a patch).
  • Clean up and improve the existing benchmarks.
  • ...

Component: performance

Branch/Commit: public/benchmarking-framework @ 0a7b47f

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16510

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

saraedum commented Feb 9, 2023

see also #25262 for using an external tool (asv) instead.

@mezzarobba
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, that's certainly a better option, and the attached branch has bitrotten. I think we can close this ticket. (Opinions?)

@vincentmacri
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that's certainly a better option, and the attached branch has bitrotten. I think we can close this ticket. (Opinions?)

Since you created the ticket I think if you're good with closing it then it can be closed. Closing as stale.

@vincentmacri vincentmacri closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants