-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extension of admissible indices conventions for tensors with indices #29099
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Commit: |
comment:5
Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date. |
comment:6
See https://sympa.obspm.fr/wws/arc/sagemanifolds.list/2020-01/msg00003.html |
comment:10
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date. |
comment:11
Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review. |
comment:12
Stalled in |
Following a request from Jonathan Thornburg we include the following indices convention which is standard but up to now not implemented.
X_{ab} := R<sup>c{}_a{}</sup>d{}_b \bar{h}_{cd}
CC: @egourgoulhon @sagetrac-mbejger
Component: manifolds
Keywords: tensor, tensor_with_indices, contraction, symmetries
Author: Léo Brunswic
Branch/Commit: u/gh-LBrunswic/extension_of_admissible_indices_conventions_for_tensors_with_indices @
93ec3e7
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29099
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: