Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extension of admissible indices conventions for tensors with indices #29099

Open
LBrunswic mannequin opened this issue Jan 29, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

extension of admissible indices conventions for tensors with indices #29099

LBrunswic mannequin opened this issue Jan 29, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@LBrunswic
Copy link
Mannequin

LBrunswic mannequin commented Jan 29, 2020

Following a request from Jonathan Thornburg we include the following indices convention which is standard but up to now not implemented.

X_{ab} := R<sup>c{}_a{}</sup>d{}_b \bar{h}_{cd}

CC: @egourgoulhon @sagetrac-mbejger

Component: manifolds

Keywords: tensor, tensor_with_indices, contraction, symmetries

Author: Léo Brunswic

Branch/Commit: u/gh-LBrunswic/extension_of_admissible_indices_conventions_for_tensors_with_indices @ 93ec3e7

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29099

@LBrunswic LBrunswic mannequin added this to the sage-9.1 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@LBrunswic LBrunswic mannequin added p: trivial / 5 labels Jan 29, 2020
@LBrunswic

This comment has been minimized.

@LBrunswic
Copy link
Mannequin Author

LBrunswic mannequin commented Jan 29, 2020

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jan 29, 2020

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

93ec3e7Bug correction and updated documentation and tests

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jan 29, 2020

Commit: 93ec3e7

@LBrunswic LBrunswic mannequin added the s: needs review label Jan 29, 2020
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Apr 14, 2020

comment:5

Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.1, sage-9.2 Apr 14, 2020
@egourgoulhon
Copy link
Member

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Mar 15, 2021

comment:10

Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.3, sage-9.4 Mar 15, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Jul 19, 2021

comment:11

Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.4, sage-9.5 Jul 19, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

mkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2021

comment:12

Stalled in needs_review or needs_info; likely won't make it into Sage 9.5.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.5, sage-9.6 Dec 18, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.6, sage-9.7 Apr 2, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.7, sage-9.8 Sep 19, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-9.8 milestone Jan 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants