Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move the document "Linear Programming in Sage" to "Thematic Tutorials" #8467

Closed
sagetrac-mvngu mannequin opened this issue Mar 7, 2010 · 15 comments
Closed

move the document "Linear Programming in Sage" to "Thematic Tutorials" #8467

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin opened this issue Mar 7, 2010 · 15 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Mar 7, 2010

Move the document "Linear Programming in Sage", found here and here, to the classification "Thematic Tutorials". The original proposal can be found on sage-devel and sage-combinat-devel.

Notes: The current ticket needs to be coordinated with #8470.

Depends on #7311

The methods detailed in this Howto, along with some features used, makes it dependent also on :

Nathann

CC: @nathanncohen @jasongrout

Component: documentation

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8467

@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin added this to the sage-4.6 milestone Mar 7, 2010
@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin self-assigned this Mar 7, 2010
@sagetrac-mvngu

This comment has been minimized.

@nathanncohen

This comment has been minimized.

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 9, 2010

comment:2

Here is where I have for the moment. I still need to rewrite LP examples for some problems, but at least I reformatted everything for Sphinx.

It will require the new LP patch enabling a new syntax for constraints #7311

Nathann

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added the s: needs work label Mar 9, 2010
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 9, 2010

comment:3

Oh yes, and there is also something to take care of : the new patch for CPLEX support brings changes to the current LP document in the Constructions manual... Only a few lines concerning CPLEX at the end of it, and some fixes, but we should not lose it when deleting the current document and replacing it with this one in the HOWTO manual :-)

Nathann

@sagetrac-mvngu

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin changed the title move the document "Linear Programming in Sage" to "Sage HOWTOs" move the document "Linear Programming in Sage" to "Thematic Tutorials" Mar 9, 2010
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 16, 2010

comment:5

this version passes doctests !

Nathann

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Mar 16, 2010

comment:6

Here it is ! :-)

@nathanncohen

This comment has been minimized.

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

comment:7

Attachment: linear_programming2.rst.gz

@sagetrac-pang
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-pang mannequin commented Jul 20, 2010

comment:8

I've read up to the "Maximum average degree" problem, and I have some found some errata:

  • line 63: Errata on example LP
  • line 161: maximization instead of minimization
  • line 177: missing objective function
  • line 200-204: problem not written properly
  • line 204: alternative formulation with only one variable for each edge

I adjoint a rst file with corrections. The example on "Maximum average degree" is correct but I find it harder to follow than the previous ones, for a non-expert in graph-theory. I don't know which is the target audience...

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jul 21, 2010

comment:9

Attachment: linear_programming2_some_changes.rst.gz

Thank you very much for reading it until then !!! Actually, I will need to change some parts of it now that GLPK is a standard SPKG. I will also update the end of it, to give more natural examples :-)

I am setting it to "needs work" until this is done !!

Nathann

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

comment:10

When this is ready, could you produce it as a Mercurial patch file?

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jul 28, 2010

comment:11

Of course of course ! :-)

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Sep 4, 2010

comment:12

This ticket should be closed as a duplicate of #9836 :-)

Nathann

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Sep 10, 2010

comment:13

Close as duplicate of #9836.

@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin removed the s: needs work label Sep 10, 2010
@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin closed this as completed Sep 10, 2010
@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin removed this from the sage-4.6 milestone Sep 10, 2010
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants