Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Safer vcg in CRefine #726

Open
Xaphiosis opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Safer vcg in CRefine #726

Xaphiosis opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement proof engineering nicer, shorter, more maintainable etc proofs

Comments

@Xaphiosis
Copy link
Member

As seen in this rambly gist
https://gist.github.com/Xaphiosis/2fa2b51b65e05c3addda1576f90a31ed

One way of getting around schematic unification disaster with the vcg method is via subset_refl. @lsf37 suggested we do this:

method svcg = rule conseqPre, vcg, rule order.refl

The question is whether we should look at anything else about this, deployment and the inevitable name bikeshed.
@Xaphiosis Xaphiosis added enhancement proof engineering nicer, shorter, more maintainable etc proofs labels Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement proof engineering nicer, shorter, more maintainable etc proofs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Xaphiosis