Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consistency in inverses of precedes and precedes directly #551

Closed
rjyounes opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Consistency in inverses of precedes and precedes directly #551

rjyounes opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@marksem
Labels
topic: inverses

Comments

@rjyounes
Copy link
Collaborator

rjyounes commented Sep 3, 2021

precedesDirectly has inverse followsDirectly, but precedes has no inverse follows. Should be consistent one way or another.

Relates to the general issue of inverses: #506.
@rjyounes rjyounes added the status: under review In triage label Sep 10, 2021
@rjyounes rjyounes mentioned this issue Jan 13, 2022
Closed
@rjyounes rjyounes assigned uscholdm and mdfeickert and unassigned uscholdm Jun 23, 2022
@rjyounes rjyounes removed the status: under review In triage label Jun 23, 2022
@rjyounes rjyounes assigned marksem and unassigned uscholdm and mdfeickert Sep 8, 2022
@Jamie-SA
Copy link
Contributor

Added to #506 and closing this one.

@philblackwood
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, gist:follows is included in gist11.1.0 so this issue can be closed.

@Jamie-SA Jamie-SA mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2023
Closed
26 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@marksem marksem

Labels
topic: inverses
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@rjyounes @uscholdm @marksem @Jamie-SA @mdfeickert @philblackwood