Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underestimated infomation limit for moderm TEM in HRTEM simulation #9

Open
XuebingZhao opened this issue Aug 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@XuebingZhao
Copy link

Hi Seto,
When I set the TEM properties in HRTEM simulation, the resulted resolution is much lower than the real TEM.
As you can see in the picture, Cc=1.6 mm and dE=0.8 eV only give ~0.1nm infomation limit. In modern aberration-corrected TEM, we can easily get ~0.06-0.07nm. Meanwhile, the Sidorov's ctfExplorer gives resonable esitimate.
In his website http://www.maxsidorov.com/ctfexplorer/, he said he changed the temporal envelope in latest version
And I finally found a different formula here http://ctfsimulation.bio.purdue.edu/java/, in which the coefficient changed from 1/2 to 1/16*ln(2)
Capture

@seto77
Copy link
Owner

seto77 commented Aug 28, 2021

Thank you very much for your very informative report. You are a very insightful person.

This is because the previous version expected the sigma (σ) of the Gaussian function, not the full width at half maximum (FWHM), as the input value for delta E.

I have released a new version of ReciPro (ver4.813). In this version and later, the FWHM value is used as delta E.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants