You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It allows you to run an external command which generates content. For example, we use it to generate a sequence of images with an external command called Gource. That is how we generate this live stream:
Before we added "external_command", we used to do this with "raw_images" through a fifo. But that required a separate fifo and an additional script to manage it.
Also, "external_command" is more flexible because it can generate an image sequence, or video, or audio, whereas "raw_images" requires a sequence of images specifically.
So I'm struggling to come up with a good reason to keep "raw_images".
Now that we have "external_command" as an input type, it's no longer clear if "raw_images" offers anything unique or valuable.
Thoughts? Please comment!
If nobody has an opinion on this, I may drop it soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: