Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Biodiverse::Spatial::compare sub should recognise recycled results #107

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

The spatial (moving window) analyses recognise when the results are
constant across a neighbour set, and recycle the results into each element
in that set.  This results in smaller file sizes, as the results are stored
once and each element then just refers to this.   

However, the compare sub (as used in the randomisations) does not recognise
this.  It therefore stores a different set of of results for each element,
even though these are identical for the neighbour set.  For large data sets
this can result in proportionally larger file sizes.

If the spatial conditions and definition queries for the base and comp data
sets are identical, and recyclable, then the comparison should also recycle
the results.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by shawnlaffan on 9 Mar 2010 at 5:02

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Change name

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 9 Mar 2010 at 5:10

  • Changed title: Biodiverse::Spatial::compare sub should recognise recycled results
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Fix implemented in revision 1602.

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 17 Mar 2010 at 1:26

  • Changed state: Fixed
  • Added labels: Milestone-Release0.14
  • Removed labels: ****

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants