Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trees - trimming large trees is slower than it should be #470

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Trees - trimming large trees is slower than it should be #470

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.  Trim a large tree to match a basedata (e.g. 4000 terminals, 9000 internal 
nodes).


The trimming process is much slower than it should be.  

Original issue reported on code.google.com by shawnlaffan on 8 Jun 2014 at 10:52

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This was updated in r2440 and r2441.

Need to add some tests before the issue can be closed. 

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 8 Jun 2014 at 10:54

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue was updated by revision r2444.

Add tests for the trimming. 

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 9 Jun 2014 at 8:43

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Mark as fixed.  

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 10 Jun 2014 at 11:32

  • Changed state: Fixed
  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue was updated by revision r2486.

Checking for possible memory leaks - none found.

Original comment by shawnlaffan on 16 Jun 2014 at 6:29

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@shawnlaffan shawnlaffan modified the milestone: Release1.0 Apr 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants