You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Chicago style implementation ignores the day although it shall be used when available for some formats (typically, journal articles)
The month is output as set in the .bib file, but it should be replaced by a true month name (abbreviated or not depending on the citation style, Chicago if I read it correctly recommends the full month name). The problem is, BibTeX has a loose definition for month, which can be a number (e.g. "3") or a full string (e.g. "March") or a "standard" 3-letter code (= "mar"); the recommendation is to use the latter.1
Moreover, the date shall likely be formatted according to language-specific rules.2
Note that babel for LaTeX has tables of month names and date rules for all supported languages... But it seems that language support for bibliographies comes with babelbib which also has month name translations. I'm a bit lost here, regarding how it works in the LaTeX world... ↩
At least according to some online citation tools I tried. I haven't looked deeply into CSL examples... ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Moreover, at syntax level, we also need to support the more modern (biblatex) extended date field (noted in passing when working on biblatex aliases, this one is of a slightly different nature). I've written an ISO 8601-2 EDTF parser in Lpeg, so I will contribute it.
I've written an ISO 8601-2 EDTF parser in Lpeg, so I will contribute it.
I've added the ISO date-time parser, support for the date field, and slightly better date formatting in #2071 -- But there's more things needed to fully address the topic. Having to do our own "hand-made" implementation of the Chicago style, and to add a huge number of localization strings in our fluent files is cumbersome.
Omikhleia mutters: CSL would be the way, and is not that hard, compared to DocBook, USX or TEI... 😸
As of today, the bibtex package does it wrong
day
although it shall be used when available for some formats (typically, journal articles)month
is output as set in the.bib
file, but it should be replaced by a true month name (abbreviated or not depending on the citation style, Chicago if I read it correctly recommends the full month name). The problem is, BibTeX has a loose definition formonth
, which can be a number (e.g."3"
) or a full string (e.g."March"
) or a "standard" 3-letter code (="mar"
); the recommendation is to use the latter.1Moreover, the date shall likely be formatted according to language-specific rules.2
Example:
@article{..., day= {14}, month = {apr}, year = {2024} ...}
apr, 2024.
April 14, 2024
in English Chicago citation style14 août 2024
in a French document3 -- however formatted, certainly not "apr" or "April" ;)Footnotes
Some references for
month
in BibTeX format:- https://www.bibtex.com/f/month-field/
- Q13 in https://mirror.ibcp.fr/pub/CTAN/biblio/bibtex/contrib/doc/btxFAQ.pdf
- p. 10 in https://ctan.mines-albi.fr/biblio/bibtex/base/btxdoc.pdf ↩
Note that babel for LaTeX has tables of month names and date rules for all supported languages... But it seems that language support for bibliographies comes with babelbib which also has month name translations. I'm a bit lost here, regarding how it works in the LaTeX world... ↩
At least according to some online citation tools I tried. I haven't looked deeply into CSL examples... ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: