Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rotate package needs to handle more than hboxes #426

Open
alerque opened this issue Dec 26, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Rotate package needs to handle more than hboxes #426

alerque opened this issue Dec 26, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement Software improvement or feature request

Comments

@alerque
Copy link
Member

alerque commented Dec 26, 2016

The current \rotate command can only handle a little bit of inline content that it wraps in an hbox. This needs to be generalized so that it can rotate a vbox as well.

@alerque alerque added the enhancement Software improvement or feature request label Dec 26, 2016
@Omikhleia
Copy link
Member

Please clarify the use case for rotating vboxes. I might have a similar need, though currently addressed (but not so conveniently) solved via parboxing (= putting vboxes in an hbox). What did you have in mind?

@Omikhleia
Copy link
Member

Forgot I had commented there. But, I guess I'll never know :D

@ctrlcctrlv
Copy link
Member

Maybe related to #1035.

@alerque
Copy link
Member Author

alerque commented Nov 9, 2022

I can't remember what my use case was.

I think a multi-layer shrink wrap of a vbox in an hbox would probably have serviced, but at the time I don't know if I understood the internal come up with something like that. And at this point I don't think many other folks would be either.

I think it would be reasonable to extend the intelligence of the tooling we have so that it would cover this task as expected to a newcomer. Unless there is some reason we can't automatically handle the necessary wrapping when called for lets keep this open to track making that happen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Software improvement or feature request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants