Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] the ability to opt a controller out of sync from commands #52

Open
caleyg opened this issue May 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@caleyg
Copy link

caleyg commented May 1, 2023

It might be helpful to have the ability to opt-out a controller in Firestorm to not send commands to. I see this being implemented by selecting the controller in Firestorm and then having the .map() in the send command object ignore the selected Pixelblaze ids. The UI could either present checkboxes or a button labeled enable or disable depending on the state of the controller saved in the DB instance of the Firestorm server.

For my use case, I have an art piece with two Pixelblaze controllers attached to it, a Pico and a PB standard. Essentially the pico runs a border of 345 a led string that looks really good on a particular pattern that is different from what the other PB is running over 500 LEDs in the center, which I would love to have Firestorm control with the other PBs in the network.

Presently both strands are synced together if an instance of Firestorm is running in a network which might be undesirable for some.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant