Change package name

[overheadhunter]

de.skymatic.app isn't a good package name. Use de.skymatic.appbills or something similar.

@tobihagemann any ideas for a name? Maybe even for a product name? I consider appstore-reverse-charger only the working title.

[infeo]

I agree with you, the identifier should be more specific. Since this package contains the gui, i would rename it to de.skymatic.gui. But this is also quite generic.

Maybe the main class should be outsourced in an extra package? Then we can choose the name quite freely. This would also be beneficial in combination with the module system, since then really only the main class is accessible from the outside.

[overheadhunter]

It is not the Skymatic GUI, is it?

Follow the vendor.product.component scheme.

I don't mind, if you add "gui" (even though I prefer vertically sliced package names), but please add an application name!

[infeo]

For a good name we can open a new issue, right now i just renamed it to fit into the suggested scheme.