Is quill dead?

[SangeetDhakal]

No updates.
Version 2.0 still on development mode.
No commits.
Is it dead?

[statler]

Yes

[romulo94]

Really?

[salmin89]

Are there any up-to-date maintained alternatives that anyone can recommend?

[SangeetDhakal]

I used a package called jodit-react. It's far better and easier and with much more features with support for tables and image and video resizing right on the editor.

[salmin89]

I used a package called jodit-react. It's far better and easier and with much more features with support for tables and image and video resizing right on the editor.

That's just an react-wrapper for jodit which has some limitations unless you want to pay. Also it doesn't seem to have any mention-support which is the module that I'm using from quill.

In case they don't update their packages - recommendations for Mention-like libraries would be appreciated!

[fbaube]

TipTap looks promising. https://www.tiptap.dev/

[smalos]

Quill seems to be dead.. 1k issues and the developer doesn't seem to be active anymore or does not answer questions here

[SF-Simon]

TipTap looks promising. https://www.tiptap.dev/

We are also ready to use tippap, because quilljs has not been updated for a long time, and we suspect that it will lose support at any time.

[scholar6admin]

We didn't want to move to another editor. So we have forked Quill.
https://github.com/scholar-6/quill/tree/master

We are a tiny company building our own product so do not have enough resources to fix all the issues in the original repo (just the ones that are affecting us directly) but people are welcome to install our fork manually.
npm install --save https://github.com/Scholar-6/quill/tarball/master

We will open a long standing pull request back to Quill mainline if anyone of the original maintainers reads this.

[npcole]

We didn't want to move to another editor. So we have forked Quill.
https://github.com/scholar-6/quill/tree/master

We are a tiny company building our own product so do not have enough resources to fix all the issues in the original repo (just the ones that are affecting us directly) but people are welcome to install our fork manually.
npm install --save https://github.com/Scholar-6/quill/tarball/master

We will open a long standing pull request back to Quill mainline if anyone of the original maintainers reads this.

Thank you for opening this fork. I will look at switching to using it.

[SixYearsInFebruary]

We didn't want to move to another editor. So we have forked Quill.
https://github.com/scholar-6/quill/tree/master

We are a tiny company building our own product so do not have enough resources to fix all the issues in the original repo (just the ones that are affecting us directly) but people are welcome to install our fork manually.
npm install --save https://github.com/Scholar-6/quill/tarball/master

We will open a long standing pull request back to Quill mainline if anyone of the original maintainers reads this.

Any plan to fix CVE-2021-3163 and release a version?

[hzjswlgbsj]

We didn't want to move to another editor. So we have forked Quill.
https://github.com/scholar-6/quill/tree/master

We are a tiny company building our own product so do not have enough resources to fix all the issues in the original repo (just the ones that are affecting us directly) but people are welcome to install our fork manually.
npm install --save https://github.com/Scholar-6/quill/tarball/master

We will open a long standing pull request back to Quill mainline if anyone of the original maintainers reads this.

May I ask which version you are developing based on

[jtlindsey]

https://www.npmjs.com/package/@editorjs/editorjs is also a good alternative.

[EricHirst-BZ]

There's been new activity from @jhchen recently, so perhaps the parrot's just been resting. EditorJS is kind of active, but based on my personal experience with it so far I'm thinking about dumping it in favor of Quill.

[salmin89]

@EricHirst-BZ I have been messing around with CKEditor. Seems like it's very customizable and it also has the plugins I was using. Well written documentation and latest release was 15 days ago.
I would have preferred quill if it was active though

[EricHirst-BZ]

@salmin89 Thanks. FYI I did go ahead and just used quill for my pretty simple use cases. I'm not worried about vendor lock since we scrub and persist only the HTML. I didn't look at CKEditor.

[ile]

We didn't want to move to another editor. So we have forked Quill. https://github.com/scholar-6/quill/tree/master

We are a tiny company building our own product so do not have enough resources to fix all the issues in the original repo (just the ones that are affecting us directly) but people are welcome to install our fork manually. npm install --save https://github.com/Scholar-6/quill/tarball/master

We will open a long standing pull request back to Quill mainline if anyone of the original maintainers reads this.

Hey @scholar6admin,

Are you still maintaining this? There is one bug that affects Firefox: #3750

[janwirth]

I recommend anyone not to use Quill. It is the worst choice I've made in my front-end stack. 👎

[johnnyoshika]

I recommend anyone not to use Quill. It is the worst choice I've made in my front-end stack. 👎

@janwirth Can you elaborate why?

[v1talii-dev]

I recommend anyone not to use Quill. It is the worst choice I've made in my front-end stack. 👎

@janwirth Can you elaborate why?

the-airbender/quill_html_editor#30 (comment)

[BogdanKotarlic]

I see that 2.0.0-beta.0 version is published 7 days ago. Does anyone have more info?

[jraoult]

@BogdanKotarlic well seems like @luin took over the repo and here's the result: https://github.com/quilljs/quill/blob/138aff939b8bd1d191bf017a991fb0ac8f993e91/CHANGELOG.md#v200-beta0. I totally lost hope and didn't see it coming but it seems like we might have a renaissance here 😉🙏

[janwirth]

@johnnyoshika sorry for the late reply: I used it in one of my bigger projects and it was just a major hassle to integrate in many ways, from the HTML structure through plugins, also wrapping it as a custom element.

I can't speak about the 2.0.0 version though.

[rushal497]

1)Quill is going to support table?
2)If it is when ,i cud see the lots of questions but no valid answer.
3)quill-better-table and quill-table-ui as support for table in react are not compatible with latest quill versions.
Any updates will be more helpful

[luin]

@rushal497 Quill 2.0 provides essential support for constructing robust table features. Feel free to give it a try on Slab, where we've implemented the table format based on Quill 2.0 beta version. It's been running seamlessly for several months without any reported issues. We plan to open-source it and make it an official plugin, but our immediate focus lies in enhancing documentation for Quill 2.0. This will enable the community to transition smoothly to the new version.

[chienweiluo]

it've just released 2.0.0. We could give it a try.

[ile]

Can someone please test this? #4039

On https://quilljs.com/ with the first demo that you see there.