Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data sets with coverage of a whole EU country #11

Open
2 of 6 tasks
tomreznik opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 of 6 tasks

Data sets with coverage of a whole EU country #11

tomreznik opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@tomreznik
Copy link
Contributor

tomreznik commented Jun 3, 2024

The challenge is to semi-automatically distinguish between soil-theme data sets with coverage of a whole EU/EFTA country on the one hand and data sets with regional coverage on the other hand. The evidence will be obtained obtained from the INSPIRE Geoportal.

  • with script identify datasets as ‘no coverage’ – ‘regional coverage’ – ‘national coverage’,
  • Set up gitlab CI pipeline with MU's script for automatization
  • labels are stored with records in a database (triple store) and displayed in Catalogue client
  • Retrieve 655 INSPIRE data sets from the INSPIRE Geoportal
  • Semi-automatically identify at least 50 data sets with coverage of a whole EU/EFTA country
  • have 90% or higher accuracy in identification (in comparison to manual cross-check)
@roblokers
Copy link

roblokers commented Aug 7, 2024

This is being worked on, but there's no clarity yet on how to process, store and visualise results. This might be more a user story that needs to be split into tasks for specific sprints. Also, @pvgenuchten and @roblokers still doubt if this can be fully captured in analytics, or if this would rather be a "political" decision.

Having said that, we need to decide on the demarcation of this issue for the Sep delivery. Proposal of @pvgenuchten is to do a first test and show the results --> to be agreed upon and turned into a sprint task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants