Looking for feedback on a couple use cases #128
Unanswered
JKReynolds
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
I am assuming that SolidDeveloper-2 was included in Use-Case step5 and has access to the data in the POD? How then does SolidDeveloper-2 know that data meeting the Vehicle-Data ontology exist and that they can extend it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
We have posted initial components for the User Profile use case described above and in #14 (file) to a project repository located here Thus far we have:
Some members of our team will attend Monday's (10/21) Data Interoperability Panel call to provide a brief overview, discuss, and answer questions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello, my team and I put together a couple of use cases for the user profile. We would really appreciate some feedback on these.
In addition to the use cases below, we have been doing a survey of apps to see what are the most common terms that are found in apps (Solid and non-Solid). We will soon be delivering the results of that survey as well as some proposed initial terms and definitions.
We are aware that the user profile will serve as a primary point from which the user's info is discoverable. We are primarily discussing the structure of that discoverable user information here.
Again, please read what we have here and let us know what you think. I posted these oriingally as an update to #14 however, we weren't really seeing any feedback.
Thanks.
Use Cases for the User Profile
The following use cases must be considered when designing the data model for the Solid User Profile.
Solid Data Interoperability Panel Use Case: Semantic Interoperability
Purpose: To demonstrate how a shared ontology will enable:
Preconditions:
SolidUser has a Solid Pod with their User Profile data entered.
Use Case-1:
Use Case-2:
Shared Ontology:
To demonstrate this use case, the U.S. Army Avatar Team will use the Common Core Ontologies (CCO)1 , which are a suite of logically consistent mid-level ontologies that extend from Basic Formal Ontology (BFO)2 . BFO is in final committee balloting as ISO/IEC JTC1 21838-2 Top Level Ontology. Note: Solid extension ontologies will extend from CCO, not directly from BFO.
References
1 https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies
2 https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions