Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use vectorized Quat #241

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2021
Merged

Use vectorized Quat #241

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2021

Conversation

jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

@jeanconn jeanconn commented Sep 23, 2020

Description

Use modern vectorized Quaternion.Quat instead of mica.quaterion

Testing

  • Passes unit tests on MacOS, linux, Windows (at least one required)

Did not do additional function testing except for spot-checking a few of the intermediate matrices to see if they looked reasonable compared to master.

Fixes #

Copy link
Member

@taldcroft taldcroft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM apart from the comments

mica/archive/asp_l1.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mica/archive/asp_l1.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jeanconn jeanconn changed the title WIP: use vectorized Quat Use vectorized Quat Dec 22, 2020
@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor Author

In mica, with these changes, I think we're just left with a call to mica.quaterion in the mica.web.pcad_table app. I think that's still run from the Python 2 kadi server? I don't know when we'd plan to update that kind of thing or pull out of mica and put in a web-apps area.

Copy link
Member

@taldcroft taldcroft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@taldcroft taldcroft merged commit 0fe7453 into master Jan 4, 2021
@taldcroft taldcroft deleted the vectorized_quat branch January 4, 2021 16:37
@javierggt javierggt mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants