Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update acisops/backstop_history to V3.1.0 #925

Closed
javierggt opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #919
Closed

Update acisops/backstop_history to V3.1.0 #925

javierggt opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #919
Milestone

Comments

@javierggt
Copy link
Contributor

Change Description

1_ECS4.RTS was substituted for 1_4_CTI.RTS because of the HRC anomaly.
A new method was added to Backstop_History which provides for
extracting, from the supplied command array, all commands that contain
any of the tokens supplied by a token list. An SCS-107 processing error
was fixed.

Files Changed:

acisops/backstop_history#24

Testing:

Unit and regression testing completed to assure that the
assembled histories were either unchanged from previous runs or,
changes that occurred were expected.

Tests were performed on RH 8 systems.

AUG0822 - NORMAL

MAY2820 - 4 chip LTCTI using 1_ECS4.RTS

AUG1322 - STOP RTS load after AUG0822 interrupted by BSH at 2022:223:13:49:23.000

APR0122 - SCS-107 RTS load after MAR2822 interrupted by TXINGS at 2022:087:12:40:47

APR0322 - SCS-107 RTS load after MAR2822 interrupted by TXINGS at 2022:087:12:40:47

Interface impacts

None.

Review

Objectives and Results by ACIS Ops

Deployment Plan

Installation of Backstop History will occur once approved by FSDS.

Includes the following merges:

  • PR #24: New ECS RTS file, New method added, SCS-107 bug fixed
  • PR #23: Remove unnecessary and incorrectly applied round off
@javierggt javierggt added this to the 2022.9 milestone Sep 21, 2022
@javierggt javierggt mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant