-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multigather individual contigs from one file #3089
Comments
hi @Krasnopeev, in re the overwriting of outputs, I think you're running into the gap between our latest development version and the latest release! See the comment here; as of a few weeks ago, #2722 was merged, but has not yet been released - it will be in sourmash v4.8.7, sometime soon (next 3-4 weeks). If you want to use the latest dev version, you can try compiling sourmash yourself as per comment with the following modification:
but I know that's a lot of unwelcome work ;(. I still have some more work to do on #2816 to respond to the latest comments, too. Apologies! In terms of things to do today with v4.8.6 -
sorry again for all the construction dust! |
thanks @ctb ! Also I noticied that |
Excellent! Yes, I was going to let you know about 4.8.7 but didn't get a chance before you found it for yourself ;)
Yep - fastmultigather should help. It uses multithreading. Please post here (this issue, or a new issue) if you have trouble using fastmultigather! |
(I need to write a little tutorial for using fastmultigather, TBH. It's a little bit different from gather at the moment.) |
I've written a short |
Hi,
I can't figure out how does
multigather
option work. Need help with it.My goal is to classify each contig from metagenome assembly for downstream analysis.
I use latest vesion of sourmash from conda installation:
I have an assembly file
contigs.fasta
with many contigs in it (about 30k contigs in total).commands I use:
The problem is that
multigather
command replace output file on each iterate.So should I made a bunch of fasta files with individual contig and try to reproduce pipeline from issue #2816 (comment) or there is another way to do get taxonomy classification for each contig?
Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: