Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work around NotImplemented Quantity.tofile #1436

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

braingram
Copy link
Collaborator

@braingram braingram commented Oct 3, 2024

This is a follow-up to #1357 to fix a but revealed during other testing.

Calling OutlierDetection with on_disk=True fails with:

 NotImplementedError: cannot write Quantities to file.  Write array with q.value.tofile(...)

This PR works around the issue that calling tofile (which stcal now uses) is unsupported for Quantities.

This bug was hidden as the unit test that sets in_memory=True for outlier detection didn't provide an on_disk ModelLibrary which bypassed the call to tofile in stcal. This PR also updates the unit test to now check for that condition.

Regression tests all pass: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/11167537599

Tasks

  • request a review from someone specific, to avoid making the maintainers review every PR
  • add a build milestone, i.e. 24Q4_B15 (use the latest build if not sure)
  • Does this PR change user-facing code / API? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
    • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
    • update or add relevant tests
    • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
    • start a regression test and include a link to the running job (click here for instructions)
      • Do truth files need to be updated ("okified")?
        • after the reviewer has approved these changes, run okify_regtests to update the truth files
  • if a JIRA ticket exists, make sure it is resolved properly
news fragment change types...
  • changes/<PR#>.general.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change
  • changes/<PR#>.docs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.stpipe.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.associations.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.scripts.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.mosaic_pipeline.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.patch_match.rst

steps

  • changes/<PR#>.dq_init.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.saturation.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.refpix.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.linearity.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.dark_current.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.jump_detection.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.ramp_fitting.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.assign_wcs.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.flatfield.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.photom.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.flux.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.source_detection.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.tweakreg.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.skymatch.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.outlier_detection.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.resample.rst
  • changes/<PR#>.source_catalog.rst

@braingram braingram marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 18:38
@braingram braingram requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2024 18:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.38%. Comparing base (8601da8) to head (f2c004d).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1436   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.38%   78.38%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines        7680     7680           
=======================================
  Hits         6020     6020           
  Misses       1660     1660           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
nightly 62.12% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 8601da8

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mairanteodoro mairanteodoro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Thanks, @braingram!

@braingram braingram merged commit 2383105 into spacetelescope:main Oct 4, 2024
31 checks passed
@braingram braingram deleted the outlier_on_disk branch October 4, 2024 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants