You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The behavior I'd expect is that spackbot (or any other mechanism) takes care of canceling previously running pipelines before starting the new ones. This to avoid races when writing to the same buildcache.
Additional notes
The first pipeline was canceled manually on request from the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alalazo
changed the title
Asking Spackbot to re-run pipelines may leave multiple concurrent pipelines for the same PR
Re-run pipelines may leave multiple concurrent pipelines for the same PR
May 17, 2023
alalazo
changed the title
Re-run pipelines may leave multiple concurrent pipelines for the same PR
Re-run pipelines leaves multiple concurrent pipelines for the same PR
May 17, 2023
This was reported in Slack by @stephenmsachs
In spack/spack#37627 a few new pipelines are added. As part of CI pipelines were running here:
Then there was a request to spackbot to "re-run pipelines", see spack/spack#37627 (comment) with subsequent reply at spack/spack#37627 (comment).
The new pipelines started here:
concurrently with the ones above.
Expected behavior
The behavior I'd expect is that spackbot (or any other mechanism) takes care of canceling previously running pipelines before starting the new ones. This to avoid races when writing to the same buildcache.
Additional notes
The first pipeline was canceled manually on request from the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: