You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several of the classes currently shown in the Licensing profile are just listed as placeholders, and should not be filled in until the Change Proposal linked above is resolved.
Depending on the resolution of that Change Proposal, the names and meanings of several of the Classes may be adjusted accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With #268, I believe this has now been implemented for purposes of the 3.0-rc data model.
Further updates are needed to some of the ancillary SPDX spec materials, in particular updating the License Expression Syntax in the prior annex at https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/SPDX-license-expressions/. And, relatedly, figuring out where and how the content from those annexes is getting carried over into 3.0. :) So I'm going to mark this as still pending for the 3.0 milestone.
NOTE: This issue is pending resolution of the change proposal at spdx/change-proposal#4
Several of the classes currently shown in the Licensing profile are just listed as placeholders, and should not be filled in until the Change Proposal linked above is resolved.
Depending on the resolution of that Change Proposal, the names and meanings of several of the Classes may be adjusted accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: