Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Servlet-based UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is active in a reactive app #43334

Conversation

BenchmarkingBuffalo
Copy link
Contributor

The UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is only to be active in a servlet based web application

See gh-43326

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Nov 30, 2024
@BenchmarkingBuffalo BenchmarkingBuffalo force-pushed the 43326-servlet-based-UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration-is-active-in-a-reactive-app branch 2 times, most recently from 0fcf2c2 to 9cb236c Compare December 1, 2024 01:17
The UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is only to be active in a servlet based web application

See spring-projectsgh-43326
@mhalbritter mhalbritter changed the title Making UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional Servlet-based UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration is active in a reactive app Dec 2, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: regression A regression from a previous release and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 2, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.4.x milestone Dec 2, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@sephiroth-j
Copy link

It would be consequent to make ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional as well.

@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

It would be consequent to make ReactiveUserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration conditional as well.

I've opened #43345.

@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @BenchmarkingBuffalo !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: regression A regression from a previous release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants