Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release Spyder 5.4.2 #20363

Closed
7 of 8 tasks
dalthviz opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
7 of 8 tasks

Release Spyder 5.4.2 #20363

dalthviz opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@dalthviz
Copy link
Member

dalthviz commented Jan 12, 2023

An issue to follow up Spyder 5.4.2 release.

New dependencies or version requirements updates:

  • spyder-kernels to 2.4.2 (pending release)
  • python-lsp-server to 1.7.1 (pending release)
  • Check potential contraints lossening for qdarkstyle

Other things:

@dalthviz dalthviz added this to the v5.4.2 milestone Jan 12, 2023
@dalthviz dalthviz self-assigned this Jan 12, 2023
@larsoner
Copy link
Contributor

One potential thing to consider adding or opening an issue for: relaxing the pin on qdarkstyle -- see conda-forge/spyder-feedstock#141 (conda-forge appears to just follow the pin in 5.x and master)

@dalthviz
Copy link
Member Author

dalthviz commented Jan 12, 2023

Hi @larsoner thank you for the feedback! What do you think @ccordoba12 ? Is there any specific reason to have the current constraint for qdarkstyle?

@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

One potential thing to consider adding or opening an issue for: relaxing the pin on qdarkstyle

Thanks @larsoner for chiming in and pointing that out!

Is there any specific reason to have the current constraint for qdarkstyle?

Yeah, we have a lot of customizations on top of qdarkstyle and we have to carefully review if new versions don't break the Spyder UI. I'll take a look at that for 5.4.2 too then.

@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

ccordoba12 commented Jan 18, 2023

Sorry guys but updating qdarkstyle proved to be a bit harder than I thought, so I'm afraid we won't be able to do it for this release. However, we'll take a look at it for 5.4.3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants