Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leak analysis failed #380

Closed
rohans310 opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Leak analysis failed #380

rohans310 opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@rohans310
Copy link

* FAILURE:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'boolean java.lang.String.equals(java.lang.Object)' on a null object reference
at com.squareup.leakcanary.HeapAnalyzer.findLeakingReference(HeapAnalyzer.java:160)
at com.squareup.leakcanary.HeapAnalyzer.checkForLeak(HeapAnalyzer.java:95)
at com.squareup.leakcanary.internal.HeapAnalyzerService.onHandleIntent(HeapAnalyzerService.java:57)
at android.app.IntentService$ServiceHandler.handleMessage(IntentService.java:66)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:102)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:148)
at android.os.HandlerThread.run(HandlerThread.java:61)

* Reference Key: 9d401e43-1f5e-4ba7-99ad-e44274f5bdca
* Device: motorola motorola XT1095 victara_tmo
* Android Version: 6.0 API: 23 LeakCanary: 1.3.1
* Durations: watch=5236ms, gc=192ms, heap dump=8036ms, analysis=28386ms

Could you please address this?

@vanniktech
Copy link
Contributor

You're most probably using 1.3.1 and you should be using 1.4-SNAPSHOT since there this was fixed.

@jrodbx
Copy link
Collaborator

jrodbx commented Jan 7, 2016

Duplicate of #341

@jrodbx jrodbx closed this as completed Jan 7, 2016
@jrodbx
Copy link
Collaborator

jrodbx commented Jan 7, 2016

@rohans310, as @vanniktech mentions, please refer to latest 1.4-SNAPSHOT.

@rohans310
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants