Logic issue in SalaryGovPlugin

[pause125]

Feature Request

Describe the Feature Request

For now, signer with boss_cap can set_salary_period without limit, that's in fact a way to modify the salary for all member. It's not reasonable and fair for members.

Describe Preferred Solution

Give every member an independent period config
the period can be:

• option 1: unmodifiable
• option 2: modified when both boss and member confirmed.

If the feature request is approved, would you be willing to submit a PR?
Yes / No (Help can be provided if you need assistance submitting a PR)

[pause125]

I'm trying to fix this and add integration test, but found a more serious issue, that is: every member's SBT amount is 0, and there's no boss in the initial state, and the boss can only be selected through proposal but no one has vote weights. It's deadlock!

So I want to know which scenario will this plugin be used for and try to find a feasible solution. @jolestar @WGB5445 @baichuan3 @welbon

[jolestar]

I think the salary and boss system are too complex to adapt to different DAO, and we should move the SalaryGovPlugin as a test plugin;

maybe it can be a third-party plugin not in Framework.