Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is TERGM adapted to valued networks? #1

Open
runnytone opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Is TERGM adapted to valued networks? #1

runnytone opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@runnytone
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution.
Is TERGM adapted to valued networks?

@krivit
Copy link
Member

krivit commented May 25, 2018

Not at this point. How to do so is subject of ongoing research.

@runnytone
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply.

@knrg07
Copy link

knrg07 commented Apr 13, 2022

I know this is nearly 4 years later, but might this feature be something that's still under consideration?

@caibugaosunine
Copy link

I'm also concerned about this issue.

@krivit
Copy link
Member

krivit commented Mar 1, 2023

It's on the road map, but we haven't been able to find the time or the funding to implement it properly.

@ijs33
Copy link

ijs33 commented Jul 26, 2024

Hi Pavel,
Another year has just passed :)
Is there any available extension for TERGM that handles valued networks?
Do you know other options/methods to handle yearly valued networks?
Thank you,
Best regards.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants