-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use https:// deep links instead of status-im:// - Windows #9549
Comments
@endulab please, could you add the following to description as one of acceptance criteria
of
– source, ChatGPT |
Confirming that deep links still work on Windows. Changing to https:// |
I tried using Unless I misunderstood the task, I don't think it's possible to make a deep link start with We can have |
@jrainville thanks,
I'd say following supports your conclusion.
And about,
were you able to test that with |
I'll test it, but it should be supported |
Right. And just to make sure, I was referring to
|
@felicio I just tested and it works. |
thank you @jrainville. Going forward, do you favor @John-44 given the discussion here, Windows app won't automatically open on clicking Cc @jakubgs |
We should use status-app:// as it's more in-line with the status.app domain we will be using for the new websites going forward |
@jrainville @endulab please, will you handle that as part of this issue or create a follow-up? |
@jrainville @felicio this Microsoft page describes how a Windows app can register to handle http and https links in it's manifest, so if the user clicks on a https link that contains a domain is associated with the app in the manifest, the link is opened by the app instead of a web browser https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/launch-resume/web-to-app-linking Edit: just realised this is a page from Microsoft's UWP documentation :-( |
Could packaging Status as a UWP app for windows could be an option? Probably not, but from a quick google: it seems that they can be directly installed without going through the windows app store ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71800494/digitally-sign-a-uwp-standalone-app-package ) and building UWP apps is supported by QT5 ( https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/winrt-support.html ) |
Reading the documentation, I have a couple of doubts/questions. In the Microsoft docs, they say:
Does that mean that only Edge Legacy supports that linking feature, or they are just explaining badly? Then, they go on to show how to handle the link activation in the app... in C#. Another thing that concerned me from the QT docs is this:
If it is really that we cannot share the clipboard from our app with other apps, then that's big hit on UX and not worth it IMO. In sum, it seems like a big endeavor to switch from what we have right now to UWP, with such a small deadline. Can we do that switch after the MVP and support The switch to |
Agreed, I don't think changing to being a UWP app is a good idea for several reasons. Shared because I found that and thought it might be interesting in the conversation, but it's not something we should do. |
Related to #7957
Discussions in status-im/status-web#327
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: