Typo: s/more/mode/ in --seq

[timmc]

I'm not actually sure I understand that sentence, but it does appear to be a typo either way.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 85.333% when pulling e245f62 on timmc:patch-1 into 0b82185 on stedolan:master.

[eric-brechemier]

@timmc If this sentence means that jq with the --seq option shall accept the output of jq used without the --seq option, it looks like a bug to me:

jq to jq --seq

$ jq -n '1,2,3' | jq --seq '.' | xxd # produces no output

The other forms work as expected:

jq --seq to jq --seq

$ jq --seq -n '1,2,3' | jq --seq '.' | xxd
0000000: 1e31 0a1e 320a 1e33 0a                   .1..2..3.

jq to jq

$ jq -n '1,2,3' | jq '.' | xxd
0000000: 310a 320a 330a                           1.2.3.

even

jq --seq to jq

$ jq --seq -n '1,2,3' | jq '.' | xxd
0000000: 310a 320a 330a                           1.2.3.