Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use optional chaining to fix compilation error #949

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

vecerek
Copy link
Contributor

@vecerek vecerek commented Oct 10, 2023

Fixes #945

…ls=all` options are set in the generated fromTimestamp function
@stephenh
Copy link
Owner

Awesome, thank you!

@stephenh stephenh merged commit b00db6f into stephenh:main Oct 10, 2023
6 checks passed
stephenh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
## [1.161.1](v1.161.0...v1.161.1) (2023-10-10)

### Bug Fixes

* use optional chaining when both `forceLong=long` and `useOptionals=all` options are set in the generated fromTimestamp function ([#949](#949)) ([b00db6f](b00db6f))
@stephenh
Copy link
Owner

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.161.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compilation error when combining useOptionals=all with forceLong=long
3 participants