You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be a small but important regression in release 2.0.0 vs 1.9.0 in the file
Arduino_Core_STM32/variants/STM32F4xx/F411C(C-E)(U-Y)/variant_BLACKPILL_F411CE.h
lines 114-117 // I2C definitions
#ifndef PIN_WIRE_SDA
#define PIN_WIRE_SDA PB3
#endif
PB3 is incorrect, it should be PB7. In release 1.9.0 it was PB7.
I confirmed this with a STM32F411CEU6 Black Pill I am working on these days, running the "I2C scanner" example.
I am not sure if this is a typo, or if the file is automatically generated from some other files, which would mean the regression is somewhere else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There seems to be a small but important regression in release 2.0.0 vs 1.9.0 in the file
Arduino_Core_STM32/variants/STM32F4xx/F411C(C-E)(U-Y)/variant_BLACKPILL_F411CE.h
lines 114-117
// I2C definitions
#ifndef PIN_WIRE_SDA
#define PIN_WIRE_SDA PB3
#endif
PB3 is incorrect, it should be PB7. In release 1.9.0 it was PB7.
I confirmed this with a STM32F411CEU6 Black Pill I am working on these days, running the "I2C scanner" example.
I am not sure if this is a typo, or if the file is automatically generated from some other files, which would mean the regression is somewhere else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: