Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Try not to use plain type for data type, and it is better to use typedef for description #31

Closed
konghaiya opened this issue Jun 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
A-feature feature with good idea

Comments

@konghaiya
Copy link
Collaborator

konghaiya commented Jun 19, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Try not to use plain type for data type, and it is better to use typedef for description.
The advantage is that if you change the type later, you don't need too much work. For the new version of c++,
you can use using new_ type_ t = pain_ old_ data_ type.

Describe the solution you'd like

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@konghaiya konghaiya added the A-feature feature with good idea label Jun 19, 2022
@RingsC RingsC added the A-help wanted Extra attention is needed label Aug 17, 2022
@RingsC
Copy link
Contributor

RingsC commented Aug 17, 2022

THIS is a part of #11, pls, refer to it for more information. And, now, here we close it, and feel free to reopen it again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-feature feature with good idea
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants