Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider not using a macro, but just using a parameterized type for ranges #513

Open
mulkieran opened this issue Oct 26, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Consider not using a macro, but just using a parameterized type for ranges #513

mulkieran opened this issue Oct 26, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

The parameter would just mark the category, sectors, bytes, data blocks, etc. The code would be the same, except for the interconverting parts. This might be doable.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mulkieran