Skip to content

Releases: stratis-storage/stratisd

Version 1.0.2

11 Dec 19:48
f80b987
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
Merge pull request #1370 from agrover/bump-ver

version 1.0.2

Version 1.0.1

31 Oct 20:53
bcb4daa
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

stratisd 1.0.1 is a bugfix release. The one user-visible change is that the directory that Stratis places symlinks to filesystems has changed from /dev/stratis to /stratis. This lets Stratis work better in conjunction with systemd, and also happens to be similar to ZFS's behavior.

Along with that, a number of critical bugs were fixed:

  • creating a snapshot with "stratis filesystem snapshot" fails with "xfs_db: command not found" due to PATH issue (#1251)
  • Adding a device to a full pool does not allow a user to immediately create new FS (#1234)
  • Limit what we allow in pool names & filesystem names (#1263)
  • creating snapshot does not check for name conflict (#1289)
  • stratisd fails when cache grows to ~40TiB (#1292)
  • Corrupt fs after tying to rsync some 90G on a 150G single fs pool (#1242)
  • Running out of space during FS creation results in bad state as dm table is left behind (#1254)

These changes should mean that Stratis is no longer guaranteed to eat your data. Please give it a spin.

Version 1.0.0

27 Sep 16:46
ccb3df6
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

I'm pleased to announce the release of stratisd and stratis-cli 1.0.0. This version indicates on-disk metadata and command-line interface stabilization, and an indicator that Stratis is ready for a wider scope of evaluation and testing.

The official release notes are here:

https://stratis-storage.github.io/relnotes/relnotes-1.0.html

Stratis 1.0 will be available soon for Fedora, and we invite you to kick the tires and tell us what you think. I'd still exercise restraint when putting irreplaceable data on it just yet.

Now would also be a great time for other distros to consider packaging Stratis. Of course, it depends on Python 3 and Rust support, but if those are available then packaging should be doable. Please feel free to get in touch offline if there's anything I can do to make packaging easier.

v0.9.0: Merge pull request #1143 from agrover/bump-ver

31 Aug 20:40
a85ace5
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

v0.5.5: Merge pull request #1082 from agrover/update-ver

02 Aug 18:54
b459812
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

v0.5.4: Merge pull request #1036 from agrover/new-ver

11 Jul 05:20
6d014b7
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

v0.5.3: Merge pull request #972 from agrover/new-version

01 Jun 22:04
888127c
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

v0.5.2: Merge pull request #915 from agrover/bump-version

01 May 22:34
9d9eb9b
Compare
Choose a tag to compare