Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate mechanisms where Broker can be used for public-ip resolution #2351

Open
sridhargaddam opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Investigate mechanisms where Broker can be used for public-ip resolution #2351

sridhargaddam opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@sridhargaddam
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sridhargaddam
Copy link
Member

sridhargaddam commented Mar 24, 2023 •
edited by nyechiel
Loading

Currently, Submariner Gateway pod uses a list of external public resolvers for discovering the public-ip associated with the gateway node. While this is working fine, some of the external resolvers throttle/block a host if it believes that the host is making too many API calls in a short duration. There is also some potential security concern with us using external servers which are not under our control.

It would be worth to explore alternatives to this and see if Broker can be used for public-ip resolution.
@sridhargaddam sridhargaddam added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 24, 2023
@sridhargaddam sridhargaddam self-assigned this Apr 27, 2023
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 17, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Sep 17, 2023
@sridhargaddam sridhargaddam removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 25, 2024
@dfarrell07 dfarrell07 removed the stale label Jan 30, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label May 30, 2024
@dfarrell07 dfarrell07 removed the stale label Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sridhargaddam sridhargaddam

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Backlog
Status: Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dfarrell07 @sridhargaddam @maayanf24