fix: update types #930
Merged
fix: update types #930
+17
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
J0
reviewed
Jul 12, 2024
J0
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Joel Lee <lee.yi.jie.joel@gmail.com>
kangmingtay
force-pushed
the
km/update-types
branch
from
458b9ff
to
c131748
Compare
kangmingtay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [2.64.4](v2.64.3...v2.64.4) (2024-07-12) ### Bug Fixes * update types ([#930](#930)) ([dbc5962](dbc5962)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
slack_oidcprovider, which supports the slack v2 APIpassword_hashandid, which allows one to specify a password hash or a custom id when creating a user through the admin methodWhat is the current behavior?
Please link any relevant issues here.
What is the new behavior?
Feel free to include screenshots if it includes visual changes.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots.