Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Denial of Service Vulnerability in ActiveRecord's PostgreSQL adapter #19

Open
sniffler-app bot opened this issue Aug 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@sniffler-app
Copy link

sniffler-app bot commented Aug 19, 2023

Description

There is a potential denial of service vulnerability present in ActiveRecord’s PostgreSQL adapter.

This has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2022-44566.

Versions Affected: All. Not affected: None. Fixed Versions: 5.2.8.15 (Rails LTS, which is a paid service and not part of the rubygem), 6.1.7.1, 7.0.4.1

Impact:
In ActiveRecord <7.0.4.1 and <6.1.7.1, when a value outside the range for a 64bit signed integer is provided to the PostgreSQL connection adapter, it will treat the target column type as numeric. Comparing integer values against numeric values can result in a slow sequential scan resulting in potential Denial of Service.
Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Workarounds

Ensure that user supplied input which is provided to ActiveRecord clauses do not contain integers wider than a signed 64bit representation or floats.
Patches

To aid users who aren’t able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the supported release series in accordance with our maintenance policy 1 regarding security issues. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

6-1-Added-integer-width-check-to-PostgreSQL-Quoting.patch - Patch for 6.1 series
7-0-Added-integer-width-check-to-PostgreSQL-Quoting.patch - Patch for 7.0 series

Informations

Manifest Path: delayed_job_active_record.gemspec

Please look at dependabot report: https://github.com/swipely/delayed_job_active_record/security/dependabot/4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant