Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spec should be more consistent with cycle versus overflow terminology #31

Open
dbaron opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@dbaron
Copy link
Collaborator

dbaron commented Aug 25, 2022

In the definition of toggle-root a concept is called <toggle-overflow> but in the API this same toggle is called "cycle" (in the cycle attribute on CSSToggle, and in the CSSToggleCycle enum).

I think these names should probably be consistent rather than using 2 different names for the same thing. I might slightly lean towards overflow since then the concept has a name different from its values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant