Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Execution of initializer expressions is confusing in readme #299

Open
papb opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Execution of initializer expressions is confusing in readme #299

papb opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation

Comments

@papb
Copy link

papb commented Mar 5, 2020

From README#L174:

If super() is not called in a derived class, and instead some other public and private fields are not added to the instance, and initializers are not evaluated.

If that happens, then what? The rest of the sentence is missing...
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@littledan @papb