Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace "would resolve to" with abstract operations #26

Open
stasm opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Replace "would resolve to" with abstract operations #26

stasm opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@stasm
Copy link
Contributor

stasm commented Aug 18, 2023

Context: #22 (comment)

MessageValue lends itself naturally to be used an abstract interface referred to by other parts of the spec. Instead of allowing unknown values as input and having to specify what happens to them when they're resolved deeper in the spec, we could assume an implicit or explicit conversion is performed up front, and then only refer to MessageValues (with a known interface!) in the rest of the spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant